Case Study II: Difference between revisions

From Tears of Themis Wiki
imported>Harmonea
No edit summary
imported>Harmonea
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
|previousStage=Case Study I
|previousStage=Case Study I
|nextStage=Case Study III
|nextStage=Case Study III
|enemyName=Artem Wing
|turnLimit=15
|description=Artem takes out the files on the case. The thick pile of files look challenging.
|description=Artem takes out the files on the case. The thick pile of files look challenging.
|stageCost=[[File:AP icon.png|28px|link=]] AP x20
|stageCost=[[File:AP icon.png|28px|link=]] AP x20
Line 22: Line 24:
}}
}}


|stageDetails=
|stageWaves=


{{Wave
{{Debate wave
|waveNum=1
|arguments=
|totalHP=10500
{{Debate argument
|waveAttribute1=Logic
|quote=Find the similarities between the cases for new discoveries.
|waveAttribute1HP=1500
|attribute=Logic
|waveAttribute2=Empathy
|hp=1500
|waveAttribute2HP=1500
|atk=140
|waveAttribute3=Intuition
|def=7500
|waveAttribute3HP=1500
}}
}}


{{Wave
{{Debate argument
|waveNum=2
|quote=Lawyers need to be able to assess the risks and take countermeasures.
|totalHP=10500
|attribute=Empathy
|waveAttribute1=Null
|hp=1500
|waveAttribute1HP=6000
|atk=140
|waveAttribute2=
|def=7500
|waveAttribute2HP=
|waveAttribute3=
|waveAttribute3HP=
}}
}}


{{Debate argument
|quote=Crime and punishment are correlated. Only the punishment can compensate for the crime.
|attribute=Intuition
|hp=1500
|atk=140
|def=7500
}}
}}
{{Debate wave
|arguments=
{{Debate argument
|quote=Every evidence must be carefully reviewed because the devil is in the details.
|attribute=Null
|hp=6000
|atk=140
|def=7500
}}
}}
|counterarguments=
{{Counterargument|attribute=Logic|phrase=The opposing attorney revealed his weakness in the opening statement.}}
{{Counterargument|attribute=Logic|phrase=Clarifying the context of a case is the basis of case analysis.}}
{{Counterargument|attribute=Empathy|phrase=I strive to improve. That's why I am always confident.}}
{{Counterargument|attribute=Empathy|phrase=There is a precedent for this case, and I've memorized it.}}
{{Counterargument|attribute=Intuition|phrase=I recommend using big data to assist you with the cross analysis.}}
{{Counterargument|attribute=Intuition|phrase=I believe a lawyer must possess a high AQ.}}
}}
}}

Revision as of 17:19, 26 August 2021

Case Study I
Case Study II
Debate Stage
Case Study III

Overview

Artem takes out the files on the case. The thick pile of files look challenging.
  • Stage Cost: AP icon.png AP x20
  • First Clear Rewards: Btn money s.pngS-Chip x40

  • Attribute: No type card icon Null
  • Recommended Power: 10724

Stage Drops

Stage Details

  • Enemy Name: Artem Wing
  • Turn Limit: 15 turns

Wave 1

Logic card type icon
Logic
"Find the similarities between the cases for new discoveries."
HP: 1500
ATK: 140
DEF: 7500
Empathy card type icon
Empathy
"Lawyers need to be able to assess the risks and take countermeasures."
HP: 1500
ATK: 140
DEF: 7500
Intuition card type icon
Intuition
"Crime and punishment are correlated. Only the punishment can compensate for the crime."
HP: 1500
ATK: 140
DEF: 7500

Wave 2

No type card icon
Null
"Every evidence must be carefully reviewed because the devil is in the details."
HP: 6000
ATK: 140
DEF: 7500

Player Counterarguments

These phrases are triggered when a player uses a card. The phrase depends on the attribute of the card selected.

Logic card type icon The opposing attorney revealed his weakness in the opening statement.

Logic card type icon Clarifying the context of a case is the basis of case analysis.

Empathy card type icon I strive to improve. That's why I am always confident.

Empathy card type icon There is a precedent for this case, and I've memorized it.

Intuition card type icon I recommend using big data to assist you with the cross analysis.

Intuition card type icon I believe a lawyer must possess a high AQ.

Retrieved from "http://tot.wiki/index.php?title=Case_Study_II&oldid=6348"