Main Story 05-42: Difference between revisions
imported>Harmonea (Created page with "{{Stage |gameMode=Main Story |stageType=Trial |name={{PAGENAME}} |previousStage=Main Story 05-41 |nextStage=Main Story 05-43 |enemyName=William Lewis |turnLimit=25 |stageCost=...") |
imported>Elaeagnifolia No edit summary |
||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
|guide= | |guide= | ||
===Trial=== | ===Trial=== | ||
{{Spoiler|text= | |||
'''Ian Johnson was suborned to commit perjury, and the proof is...''' | |||
* Ian's Testimony I | |||
'''The proof that Jasmine gave Ian a loan and not a bribe is...''' | |||
* Photo of Ian's IOU | |||
'''How do you prove that Ian's report is trusthworthy?''' | |||
* Couner with Ian's illegal conducts | |||
'''The evidence that proves Ian's real motive for stealing Opaline fish is...''' | |||
* Ian's Testimony II | |||
'''Losing the lawsuit harmed Jasmine, and the evidence is...''' | |||
* Termination Contract | |||
}} | |||
|stageWaves= | |stageWaves= |
Revision as of 04:22, 27 August 2021
Overview
- Stage Cost: AP x20
- First Clear Rewards: S-Chip x
- Attribute: Logic
- Recommended Power: 50344
Guide
- Hover to view spoiler content.
Trial
- Ian's Testimony I
The proof that Jasmine gave Ian a loan and not a bribe is...
- Photo of Ian's IOU
How do you prove that Ian's report is trusthworthy?
- Couner with Ian's illegal conducts
The evidence that proves Ian's real motive for stealing Opaline fish is...
- Ian's Testimony II
Losing the lawsuit harmed Jasmine, and the evidence is...
- Termination Contract
Summary
Debate Details
- Enemy Name: William Lewis
- Turn Limit: 25 turns
Wave 1
Empathy
Intuition
Intuition
Wave 2
Logic
Empathy
Empathy
Wave 3
Logic
Player Counterarguments
These phrases are triggered when a player uses a card. The phrase depends on the attribute of the card selected.
You are the one ignoring evidence and disrespecting the court!
The loss of her job and reputation? You think these didn't have an impact on Jasmine Kenders?
Privately contacting and threatening Ian Johnson? Is this how Baldr operates?
Ian Johnson only said he was bribed after being threatened. It is not the truth!
The courtroom is a place where justice is upheld. It is not a place for your casual arguments!
Using underhand means to achieve victory, is this your conviction as a lawyer?
Everything you've said is purely based on your own subjective assumption. Please provide evidence!
If you want to compete, please do it fair and square!
Right and wrong is decided in a court of law based on evidence. It is not for you to decide!